Chapter 163 – The Oregon State Bar PLF Does Not Deny Paying Judges For Quid Pro Quo

I had asked the OSB Professional Liability Fund via a Freedom of Information Application (FOIA) to disclose direct and indirect payments to Oregon Judges, those payments in any form imaginable. The PLF has not denied that these payments are being made to advance the interests of the PLF–namely to protect against malpractice and other claims. The PLF enjoys an early dismissal rate 4 times higher than other insurance carriers and other state sponsored malpractice programs and we are the only state that has a tax exempt quasi state fund like this that is not subject to the oversight of the state.

The PLF is organized under the Oregon Judicial branch. Money is disappearing. The ODJ will not step in and audit. The Oregon Insurance Commissioner does not have the jurisdiction.

I estimate that more than $1 Million a year is being paid by the PLF to effect the outcome of litigation benefitting the PLF. And in the last 10 years the PLF has grown to having assets approaching $100 Million, which is roughly 50 years of average annual paid claims of $2 Million.

Where is the money going? How is the PLF paying for influence? Are the recipients paying tax on the payments? I have some of the answers. Corruption is alive and well here in Oregon and the PLF does not deny it.

Chapter 162 – Hiding In Plain Sight…Oregon Judges Supporting Pedophilia

Hiding in Plain Sight are members of our judicial community who have secretly supported the decriminalization of child porn and pedophilia. The truth is that since 90% of the financial support for the LGB community comes from the heterosexual (and largely pro family) community, any LGB faction that comes out in support of pedophilia would threaten that support. Nothing would be more alarming to the pro-family community then to find that there are trusted members of our judiciary that will when the time is right announce their plan to decriminalize pedophilia–whether by law or by the abuse of a judicial position.

The identified members of Oregon Judiciary, and other prominent players, who have announced or displayed strong support for decriminalizing pedophilia and child porn are as follows:

Federal: Marco Hernandez, Michael Mosman, magistrate Paul Papak, Michael McShane, Michael Simon and Janice Stewart…which represents most of our Title III Judges. In addition FISA Judge Robert Kugler, who has from time to time meddled in our litigation here.

State: Kathie Steele, Robert Herndon, Rives Kistler (Ct. Appeals), Virginia Lindner (Ct. Appeals), Beth Allen, James Egan (Ct. Appeals), Jodie Mooney (Ct. Appeals), Cheryl Pellegrini, Lynn Nakamoto (Sup. Ct.), Bronson James (Ct. Appeals), Steven Powers (Ct. Appeals), Kat Tennyson, Darleen Ortega (Ct. Appeals), Suzie Norby, Erin Lagesen (Ct. Appeals), Adrienne Nelson (Sup. Ct.) …and many more. Half of our Oregon Ct. of Appeals..

Attorneys in Prominent Positions: Kate Brown (Gov), Tina Kotek (Speaker of The Oregon House), Carol Bernick (CEO State Bar PLF), Nena Cook (Past CEO OSB), Mark Johnson (Past CEO OSB)…and many others. Senior Executives of the PLF controlling the $100 Million war chest.

Representatives and Senators: Suzanne Bonamici, Earl Blumenauer, Ron Wyden, State Senator Floyd Prozanski, Shemia Fagan, Mark Hass and Rob Wagner.

There are many ways in which a Judicial actor can support pedophilia. One way is to assist a litigant identified as a person who is or was engaged in criminal conduct of downloading child porn. The judicial actor can assist the pedophile by refusing the opposing party discovery, suppressing evidence, denying counterclaims and otherwise setting up a litigant or by favoring another during trial. And it’s happening time and time again, this community now feeling empowered.

Evidence of this community’s preparation to decriminalize pedophilia is the effort to stack the court, some of which is through the conspired acts of Governor Brown and state judicial actors. For example, when Brown offered Misha Isaak a position on the Oregon Ct. of Appeals, without opening applications, it was an attempt to stack the court and give the LBG Ct. of Appeals Judges a super majority. Only 5% of the Portland Metro area identifies as LGB and only 2% of households. Why are more than 50% of our Ct. of Appeals Judges LGB?

The review committee evaluating Misha Isaak was made up of two LGB Judges and One Heterosexual Judge. Two of those Judges on the review committee support decriminalizing child porn and pedophilia. These LGB members have enjoyed broad support by families in this state that believed that supporting members of the LGB community would not their family at risk, and I think a high % of the LGB community does not support child porn. But the Judicial actors have tipped their hands and the one identified as pro pedophilia represent more than 50% of the identified LBG Judges.

Half of the Judges identified above have not even come out of the closet. It has been going on in silence, in plain sight.

Send your information and I’ll update the list.

Chapter 161 – Judge Marco Hernandez Endorses Perjury and Child Porn If It Supports His Social Agenda

Much to my surprise, and I really am surprised, Judge Marco Hernandez kissed off the perjury by Zweizig and subornation of perjury by Christiansen in refusing to vacate the Judgment. I had hoped that Judge Hernandez would learn from his mistakes and rectify them in this case, but he has chosen ignorance and arrogance over competence and integrity.

When I count the issues though it appears to me that he is just running a Kangaroo court and will suppress evidence and endorse perjury if it meets his agenda of social activism. Throughout this process I have struggled to trust him, but want to. I so much want to.

Judge Hernandez suppressed evidence (forensic reports) that was specifically cited in this blog as reference material produced by independent third parties opining that Zweizig downloaded and disseminated child porn using a peer to peer program registered to him. Once that was done it became a “he said she said” argument in front of a Portland jury that Judge Hernandez knew was biased.

Judge Hernandez denied my discovery, refused to allow counterclaims against Zweizig and Christiansen for publishing that I was plotting to assassinate a Federal Judge. Christiansen published the Jones and Kugler transcripts to garner the prejudicial retaliation of the court.

Judge Hernandez endorsed Christiansen’s publishing of past hearings alleging that I had been held in contempt of court when the truth was I was not so held. In fact that issue arose when I published Sandra Ware’s relationship with Judge Kugler. In the initial stage of this case, Hernandez put Christiansen on notice to stop this, but C continued and he was not sanctioned.

Judge Hernandez allowed the court’s trial transcript to be compromised, the court recordings destroyed, the clerk’s recordings destroyed, all while the recordings were subject to a litigation hold and subpoena. He further quashed the subpoena to Crow’s file, which would have shown the Kugler interference. I didn’t acquire the evidence of Kugler direct contact with Arbitrator Crow until after the trial.

And of course Judge Hernandez refused to allow a third party to interview the jurors on bias, content and misconduct. Given that the transcript was missing key statements, interviewing the jurors was imperative. In my brief discussions with jurors, had the forensic evidence showing Zweizig downloaded child porn been presented to this jury, Zweizig would not have prevailed.

From the very beginning this case reflected the bias of an attorney working for legal aid, most notably when the Judge refused to compel arbitration on the exact same claims Zweizig brought before…and those claims were subject to arbitration. More importantly Oregon and U.S. Supreme Court legal precedent demands the case be sent to arbitration, but instead Hernandez chose to adopt the ludicrously stupid arguments offered by the anti-business playbook. The Judge’s disdain for business and owners no doubt arises from his days at Legal Aid.

Hernandez put himself through school and I appreciate that effort. I did the same.

So my heart brakes at the thought that it is more important to punish me for exercising my first amendment right and publish about the Crow abuses in the 2011 arbitration then it is to follow the law. The first amendment is under attack and no place more than the U.S. District Court of Oregon. Federal Judges are charged with protecting the Constitution, not tearing it apart.

In this case Judge Hernandez and his staff knew Zweizig and Christiansen were committing perjury during the trial and he knows Zweizig downloaded and disseminated child porn. He knows Zweizig is a cybercriminal. And he knows that FISA Judge Kugler had some kind of relationship with Sandra Ware that compromised Kugler’s judicial position and may now lead to Kugler’s impeachment.

This is such a travesty for Portland. Nothing would please me more than to see the Judge pick up the mantel and protect our children from child porn and pedophilia, but he hasn’t. That’s the tragedy. I know his brother and the Judge has the capacity to be the greatest defender of good, but he has chosen a different path that serves evil, not good. And I can’t figure out why. I know his story, but I am still surprised.

The Judges 3 line Opinion is here Gmail – Activity in Case 3_15-cv-02401-HZ Zweizig v. Northwest Direct Teleservices, Inc. et al Order. To suggest my 20 references to perjury in trial transcripts is insufficient is inaccurate, but it is an apparent effort by the Judge to avoid the truth.

My Motion For Reconsideration is here 339, 340, 340-1, 340-2.

Chapter 160 – The Oregon State Bar PLF is Representing Non-attorney Supporters of Cybercrime and Child Porn

Much to my surprise, the PLF has taken up the representation of Max Zweizig and Sandra Ware. Neither are attorneys of course.

This is an amazing affront to civil rights and summarily proves that the PLF must be shutdown.

See the email from Nena Cook admitting to the representation, finally. Exhibit 1 Confirmation of paying Zweizig fees.

This free legal representation has broad repercussions, because it serves the racketeering enterprise of the PLF, which through the leadership of Carol Bernick, chooses to support a party like Zweizig to cover up the crimes of his attorneys.

What is yet unclear is whether this was requested by members of the judicial community who received undisclosed financial support from the plf in a quid pro quo relationship, or the PLF took it on to tamper with these two witnesses to the Racketeering claims against the PLF.

The PLF is organized under the umbrella of the State’s Judicial Branch. If money is being funneled out to that branch or if witnesses are being bought off with free legal services, then this is nothing but a classic bribe scheme and hush money. All crimes.

Perhaps when Carol Bernick leaves the PLF, the new administration will come clean. Bernick is going back to DWT in Portland. DWT clients beware. Bernick is no friend to business.

Chapter 159 – Shenoa Payne Was Hired By The PLF To Cover Up The Zweizig Team Fraud and Perjury

I asked the Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund to confirm or deny that Shenoa Payne was hired by the PLF to present Zweizig for free. They have refused to do so which means they did in fact hire Shenoa.

Shenoa was hired to cover up the fraud and perjury perpetrated on the trial court by the Zweizig team and to advance the PLF pro-child porn agenda. Carol Bernick has been given every opportunity to deny this and has chosen not to. I asked the board to take notice and publish a challenge to my conclusions and they have remained silent. I’ve called that Board Chair several times, as well as other members of the board, and no one has returned my call.

I must take a moment and make it clear that being pro-civil right and in particular supporting the LGB community is not the same as supporting the decriminalization of child porn. And as a quasi-government agency, the PLF has no business enjoying tax exempt government status while promoting child porn.

Shenoa Payne is an attorney who specializes in Appellate Law. She is a member of the Oregon State Bar, frequent writer for the Oregon Trial Association and advocate for the Gay and Lesbian Bar.

Civil litigation appellate work often entices attorneys to engage in dishonest work simply for the money it represents. I am sad to report that Shenoa is engaged in appellate work for dishonest clients and knowingly advances legal arguments on inaccurate facts.

Two of her clients are Max Zweizig and Joel Christiansen. Joel is also an attorneys and together he and Zweizig engaged in perjury and subornation of perjury. A criminal complaint was filed but unlike in Washington D.C., perjury is rarely punished criminally in Portland. I reference the complaint to the Mult. County D.A. here Complaint against Zweizig and Christiansen.

Shenoa is particularly disappointing because she appears to be well regarded and it’s a shame when talent is wasted on the criminally inclined. While I appreciate Shenoa’s commitment to representing employees in disputes against employers, the advocacy role was never intended to be a license to lie simply because Mult. Co. juries find in favor of employees 90% of the time regardless of the facts.

The Oregon State Bar and American Bar Association code of ethics require an attorney to tell the truth, even to the point of revealing law that is unfavorable to that attorney’s client. When an attorney is faced with a client who lied on the stand, that attorney is compelled by these same ethical standards to let the Judge know. Since Christiansen knew his client was lying and encouraged it, the mandate to intervene and tell the truth falls to Shenoa. She has failed to do so.

In my case against Zweizig, her client lied when he denied downloading and disseminating child porn using a peer to peer program in his name. He lied when he denied copyright violations and he lied when he denied destroying programming he had previously claimed did not exist. He lied a lot. Zweizig’s attorney Christiansen, who is effectively a client of Shenoa’s as well, suborned perjury by successfully suppressing forensic evidence showing the above referenced porn on a hard drive used exclusively by his client Zweizig. Christiansen then asked questions designed to cause Zweizig to lie about the porn and cybercrime. In fact I filed a Motion to Vacate the Judgement based on this fraud upon the court. See 330. One forensic report can be found here Forensic Report Williams on 120 gig 120-18.

Shenoa has seen this evidence and knows that every dollar more she succeeds in helping her client get threatens children in her client’s community and elsewhere. And yet she presses on to assist in the filthiest of services, to aid and abet child porn and perhaps all that follows.

Shenoa is not alone here. Jim Coons of the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association was also informed of the porn and he openly admitted knowing about it but decided that he would rather assist in securing more money for a former employee than protect the interests of victimized children. Both believe that this is a strategic opportunity because I am a pro se litigant, meaning they believe they have an opportunity to take advantage of the circumstances.

These are the choices we have as adults, to fight to keep children safe or to aid and abet the exploitation of children. Shenoa has chosen to aid and abet. It is just that simple. She did not need to represent Zweizig once informed of the child porn. She chose to stay and with that comes a filthy taint that clients, law firms and the Oregon State Bar should want to avoid.

Shenoa, leave the dark side before it is too late.

Until next time.