If you’re a Christian who exploits people, leads a double life or manages a “dirty” business, perhaps it’s better not to call yourself a believer, Pope Francis suggested in a homily on Thursday in Rome.
“So many Christians are like this, and these people scandalize others,” Francis said during morning Mass at Casa Santa Marta, according to Vatican Radio. “How many times have we heard — all of us, around the neighborhood and elsewhere — ‘But to be a Catholic like that, it’s better to be an atheist.’ It is that: scandal.”
“But what is scandal? Scandal is saying one thing and doing another.”
“To be a Christian means to do: to do the will of God — and on the last day — because all of us we will have one — that day what shall the Lord ask us? Will He say: ‘What you have said about me?’ No. He shall ask us about the things we did.”
Opposing counsel time and time again finds a way to lace in false and exonerated allegations against me and my companies, just like we see in the fake news today. Those allegations even if true have nothing to do with the cases before the court. And yet time and time again I see a judge grabbing onto a small fact to build a case around.
Marshall helped M commit 13 separate acts of perjury. The first to deny receiving a termination email. The second to deny receiving a termination letter. Third to deny a separate conversation about his termination. Fourth, to deny he destroyed software. Fifth to allege that he wrote the code every night. Sixth to allege we were over billing clients. Seventh to allege he filed his complaint before he was fired. Eighth to produce a spreadsheet he claimed was evidence of over billing when he created. Ninth, claiming he emails were on the computer he turned over. Tenth, claiming a 2nd hard drive was broken when it was being used by him to store music and movies. Eleventh, claiming he reformatted that hard drive six months earlier, instead of admitting that he reformatted the day before his last day. twelfth denying that programs were destroyed when he reformatted the 2nd hard drive. Thirteenth claiming that he did not store movies and videos on that hard drive. Actually I could go on.
So why are our liberal judged here so very committed to these lies.
Why does submitting a transcript of a hearing in Judge Jones chamber have any merit. Why was uncorroborated phone call between M and former employee received by the arbitrator. Why was a video taken of me talking to M in his living room and secretly taped explaining why he could not be rehired after his false complaint allowed into evidence. The moral outrage that M and Marshall showed was fake.
But the fake outrage only works on someone whose skills are compromised or totally void of moral edicts of a judge and arbitrator as reflects in their respective Codes of Ethics. The fact that they are so readily abandoned suggests we have people in positions of judicial power leading double lives, one of which is immoral and unethical. Refer to the Popes published comments.